“Up to about 1850 almost everyone believed that sciences expressed truths that were exact copies of a definite code of non-human realities. But the enormously rapid multiplication of theories these latter days has well-nigh upset the notion of any one of them being a more literally objective kind of thing than another. There are so many geometries, so many logics, so many physical and chemical hypotheses, so many classifications, each one of them good for so much and yet not good for everything, that the notion that even the truest formula may be a human device and not a literal transcript has dawned upon us.”— William James.” James was on to something.  There are so many people with ideas about the Truth and all that jazz. So I suppose he was saying that subjectivism has become more dominant than objectivism.  This makes senses, doesn’t it? After all, error is always more numerous than non-error. Millions of people are sometimes wrong and only one person is sometimes right.  Isn’t this right? Or do you disagree?  I bet more people disagree and have their own views. See what I mean? It takes only one person to be right and properly understanding that things as right or correct while everyone else is incorrect but positive that they are right and that person is wrong.  Isn’t this true?  --RLN